Vibe-coded apps aren't enough. See why teams choose Jestor over Lovable.

Lovable gives you code. Jestor gives you a system: one database underneath, your permissions, every change logged, built by our team. Unlimited users on one flat price.

The short version

Lovable is an AI app builder that turns a prompt into a codebase you own and host. Jestor is an operations platform where tables, permissions and automations already exist, the AI edits them, and Jestor’s team builds and keeps building for you.

Feature

Jestor

Lovable

Unlimited usersYes
Yes
Built and maintained for youYes
No
Company-owned apps, not personal projectsYes
No
Changes are edits, not code rewritesYes
No
Permissions and roles built in before the first promptYes
No
Custom fields on tablesYes
No
Native controlsYes
No
No-code blocksYes
No
Native tasksYes
No
DocsYes
No
IndicatorsYes
No
ChatYes
No
Email agents for ticketsYes
No
Keeps running when the monthly budget runs outYes
No
Internal-only apps on every planYes
No
Change it from Claude, Cursor or any MCP clientYes
Yes
AI builds from a promptYes
Yes
You own your data and can export itYes
Yes
Own and deploy the source codeNo
Yes

The long version

Where the two tools actually differ, from what a prompt produces to what happens when the credits run out. Sources at the end of the page.

Dimension

Jestor

Lovable

Best forInternal operations for IT and ops: requests, approvals, orders, tickets, back-office, one company-owned systemCustomer-facing apps, prototypes and products you'll own as code
What a prompt producesAn app on a platform that already has the database, permissions, automations and audit trailA codebase: React/TanStack front end, Supabase-based backend, hosted by Lovable
Who builds itJestor's team, from a scoped process; you request changes, or build and edit anything yourselfYou, prompt by prompt; Lovable’s agent runs “up to 10 hours per message”
Changing the systemEdits to tables, fields, permissions and automations, by prompt via Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT or any MCP clientNew code generation on every change; “Try to fix” loops consume credits
UsersUnlimited users on every planUnlimited members on every plan; not billed per seat. Credits are shared across the workspace
IT controlThe company owns the system. Apps, data and permissions live in one workspace IT can govern. People use the apps; they do not own themEach member can create and own their own projects inside the workspace. Built for builders, not for IT managers who need one company-owned system
When the budget runs outNothing pauses. Published limits: 3k / 15k / 50k automation runs per month by planBuilding stops; apps on Lovable Cloud “can pause” and AI features in deployed apps “stop working” until credits are available
PermissionsField-level rules on every plan, inherited by AI agentsRow-level security in Supabase/Cloud, generated by the AI; correctness is the customer's responsibility per Lovable's docs
Data modelRelational database with n:m, n:1 and 1:1 links, custom fields, formulas and views; 380+ native automationsPostgres via Supabase or Lovable Cloud; schema generated per prompt
Custom fieldsCustom fields on tables, added and edited by a builder or by prompt, without regenerating an appNo native field editor. Columns exist if the generated schema has them; changing a field is a new code generation
Native ops featuresNative controls, no-code blocks, tasks, docs, indicators and chat in the workspace, on the same databaseNot native. Tasks, docs, chat, indicators, controls and no-code blocks have to be generated as code, app by app
Tickets and emailEmail agents for tickets; each table can have an inboxNo native ticket inbox. You generate email and ticket flows in code if you need them
AI in the productChat-to-App, Ask Your Data, email agents for tickets, chatbot agents, document OCRAgent mode, Plan mode, in-app AI via Lovable AI gateway (credit-metered)
SecuritySOC 2 Type I and II, LGPD, regular pentests; SSO on Dedicated; unified audit trail for humans and AISOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 claimed; security scanner on publish; SSO on Business+, audit logs on Enterprise
Internal-only publishingEvery plan (apps live inside your Jestor workspace)Business and Enterprise plans
Code ownership / exportYou own the system and data; full export anytime, CSV and API, no exit feeYou own the code; zip download and two-way Git sync on paid plans; can't import an existing repo
When it breaksA senior Jestor builder is on it, or you ask the AI to fix the field, not the codeYou're the developer now

Lovable data from docs.lovable.dev (subscription-plans, credits-and-usage, workspace, publish, security-best-practices, security-view) and lovable.dev/security, accessed September 14, 2026. Features and prices change; verify with each vendor. Jestor data from jestor.com/plans and jestor.com/ai.

Three reasons ops teams build on Jestor instead of Lovable

Changes are edits, not rewrites.

In Lovable, every change is a new generation of code, and a new chance to break something. Reviewers on G2 put it plainly: “a change that looks simple can affect another part of the application.” In Jestor there is no codebase to regenerate. A new field, a new stage, a new automation is an edit to a structure a builder can open and read. Say it in Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT or the prompt box, or ask our team.

Permissions and security are already there.

Lovable’s docs are explicit: row-level security “acts as a final layer of protection” and “you are responsible for ensuring that your app meets the security requirements appropriate for its use case.” In Jestor, the database, roles and field-level permissions exist before the first prompt. The AI works inside them and can only touch what your role can touch. SOC 2, audited annually, same perimeter for humans and AI. The company owns the system; people use the apps, they do not own them.

We build everything. You just use it.

One prompt gets you a demo. Ten prompts get you a codebase somebody has to maintain. With Jestor, our team maps the process, builds the apps, imports your data and keeps building on a fixed review cadence. When something breaks, a senior Jestor builder is on it. You are not the developer now.

FAQ

Is Lovable good for internal tools?
Lovable can build an internal tool, and Business and Enterprise plans can restrict an app to your workspace or invited emails. What Lovable doesn't do is maintain it: every change regenerates code, permissions are generated by the AI and are the customer's responsibility per Lovable's docs, and apps on Lovable Cloud can pause when workspace credits run out. Teams that want an internal tool nobody has to babysit usually use a platform where the database, roles and audit trail already exist.
What is the difference between Jestor and Lovable?
Lovable turns a prompt into a codebase (React front end, Supabase-based backend) that you own, host on Lovable and pay for in credits. Jestor turns a prompt into an app on a platform that already has a relational database, field-level permissions, automations and an audit trail, and Jestor's team builds and maintains it for a flat monthly fee with unlimited users.
Is Jestor a Lovable alternative?
For internal operations that IT needs to own, yes. For customer-facing products or prototypes you want to own as code, no; Lovable is the better tool there.
Does Lovable charge per user?
No. Lovable prices plans by credits, not seats; inviting members doesn't change the subscription. Unlimited members on every plan. Credits are shared across the workspace and pay for building, hosting, the built-in backend and in-app AI. Jestor is a flat monthly fee with unlimited users and no credit pool.
What happens when Lovable credits run out?
Per Lovable’s documentation, building stops until credits are available, AI features in deployed apps stop working, and apps that rely on Lovable Cloud can pause; data is kept while services are paused. Publishing a static app stays free. In Jestor nothing pauses; each plan publishes its automation-run and record limits up front.
Who is responsible for security in a Lovable app?
Lovable runs a security scan on every publish that lints row-level security policies, and offers a deeper manual scan. Its docs state that RLS “acts as a final layer of protection” and that the customer is responsible for meeting the security requirements of their use case. In Jestor, roles and field-level permissions are part of the platform on every plan; the AI inherits them and cannot create its own auth flow or permission model.
Can I change a Jestor app with Claude or Cursor like I would with Lovable?
Yes. Jestor works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and any MCP client. The difference is what the AI edits: tables, fields, permissions and automations on a platform, not a codebase. The AI can only touch what your role can touch, and human and AI changes share one audit trail.
Who builds the system in Jestor?
Jestor's team does. Every plan includes a scoped setup where we map your process and build the first apps, then a review cadence (monthly on Pro, biweekly on Ops Team, weekly on Dedicated) where you request changes and we ship them. You can also make changes yourself by prompt.
How does Lovable pricing compare to Jestor?
As of September 2026, Lovable's Pro plan starts at $25 per month for 100 credits and Business at $50 per month for 100 credits, scaling to $2,250 (Pro) or $4,300 (Business) per month for 1,000 credits, with top-ups at $0.30 to $0.60 per credit. Jestor is flat: Pro $1,000 per month plus a $2,900 setup, Ops Team $5,000 per month, Dedicated custom, unlimited users on all plans.
Do I own the code in Lovable? Do I own the system in Jestor?
In Lovable you own the code and can download it or sync it two-way with GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket on paid plans. In Jestor you own the system and the data: it runs in your workspace and can be fully exported at any time via CSV or API, with no exit fee.
Can I move a Lovable app to Jestor?
Yes. Export your Supabase or Lovable Cloud tables as CSV, and Jestor's team imports them into relational tables as part of setup, rebuilding relations as links between tables and recreating the permission model.
Is Jestor secure?
Jestor is SOC 2 Type I and Type II certified, LGPD compliant and runs regular penetration tests; SSO is available on the Dedicated plan, and human and AI actions share one audit trail. Lovable states SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certification, offers SSO on Business and Enterprise and audit logs on Enterprise.
What are Jestor’s limits?
Records per table: 10,000 (Pro), 50,000 (Ops Team), 150,000 (Dedicated). Automation runs per month: 3,000 / 15,000 / 50,000. Users are unlimited on every plan.
Can Jestor and Lovable work together?
Yes. A Lovable front end can read and write Jestor tables through Jestor's open API and webhooks, and Jestor can connect to Supabase-backed apps through custom REST connectors on Lovable's side.
Sources and legal
  1. docs.lovable.dev/introduction/subscription-plans
  2. docs.lovable.dev/introduction/credits-and-usage
  3. docs.lovable.dev/features/workspace
  4. docs.lovable.dev/features/publish
  5. docs.lovable.dev/features/cloud
  6. docs.lovable.dev/tips-tricks/security-best-practices
  7. docs.lovable.dev/features/security-view
  8. docs.lovable.dev/features/agent-mode
  9. docs.lovable.dev/introduction/faq
  10. lovable.dev/security
  11. lovable.dev/blog/lovable-security
  12. g2.com/products/lovable/reviews
  13. trustpilot.com/review/lovable.dev
  14. producthunt.com/products/lovable
  15. jestor.com/plans
  16. jestor.com/ai
  17. jestor.com/main-features
  18. docs.jestor.com
Get a demo